Top of page

Notice
Special holiday hours in effect, December 2025 through January 2026. More information.

Book/Printed Material U.S. v. Microsoft did consumers win? U.S. versus Microsoft / United States versus Microsoft / US v. Microsoft

About this Item

Title

  • U.S. v. Microsoft did consumers win?

Other Title

  • U.S. versus Microsoft
  • United States versus Microsoft
  • US v. Microsoft

Summary

  • "U.S. v. Microsoft and the related state suit filed in 1998 appear finally to have concluded. In a unanimous en banc decision issued in late June 2004, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected challenges to the remedies approved by the District Court in November 2002. The wave of follow-on private antitrust suits filed against Microsoft also appears to be subsiding. In this paper we review the remedies imposed in the United States, in terms of both their relationship to the violations found and their impact on consumer welfare. We conclude that the remedies addressed the violations ultimately found by the Court of Appeals (which were a subset of those found by the original district court and an even smaller subset of the violations alleged, both in court and in public discourse) and went beyond them in important ways. Thus, for those who believe that the courts were right in finding that some of Microsoft's actions harmed competition, the constraints placed on its behavior and the active, ongoing oversight by the Court and the plaintiffs provide useful protection against a recurrence of such harm. For those who believe that Microsoft should not have been found liable because of insufficient evidence of harm to consumers, the remedies may be unnecessary, but they avoided the serious potential damage to consumer welfare that was likely to accompany the main alternative proposals. The remedies actually imposed appear to have struck a reasonable balance between protecting consumers against the types of actions found illegal and harming consumers by unnecessarily restricting Microsoft's ability to compete"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.

Names

  • Evans, David S. (David Sparks), 1954-
  • Nichols, Albert L.
  • Schmalensee, Richard
  • National Bureau of Economic Research

Created / Published

  • Cambridge, MA : National Bureau of Economic Research, c2005.

Headings

  • -  United States--Trials, litigation, etc
  • -  Microsoft Corporation--Trials, litigation, etc
  • -  Antitrust law--United States
  • -  Computer software industry--United States
  • -  Consumer protection--United States
  • -  Restraint of trade--United States

Notes

  • -  Title from PDF file as viewed on 11/28/2005.
  • -  Includes bibliographical references.
  • -  Also available in print.
  • -  Mode of access: World Wide Web.
  • -  System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Call Number/Physical Location

  • HB1

Digital Id

Library of Congress Control Number

  • 2005620792

Access Advisory

  • Unrestricted online access

Online Format

  • image
  • pdf

Additional Metadata Formats

Rights & Access

More about Copyright and other Restrictions

For guidance about compiling full citations consult Citing Primary Sources.

Cite This Item

Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data as a convenience, and may not be complete or accurate.

Chicago citation style:

Evans, David S, Albert L Nichols, Richard Schmalensee, and National Bureau Of Economic Research. U.S. v. Microsoft did consumers win?. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005. Pdf. https://aj.sunback.homes/item/2005620792/.

APA citation style:

Evans, D. S., Nichols, A. L., Schmalensee, R. & National Bureau Of Economic Research. (2005) U.S. v. Microsoft did consumers win?. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. [Pdf] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://aj.sunback.homes/item/2005620792/.

MLA citation style:

Evans, David S, et al. U.S. v. Microsoft did consumers win?. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005. Pdf. Retrieved from the Library of Congress, <aj.sunback.homes/item/2005620792/>.